2013 Chrysler Town and Country Touring-L 4dr Minivan (3.6L 6cyl 6A)
My wife and I just purchased a new 2013, and have under 1,000 miles on it.
We compared the Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna, and the T&C.
We loved the ride of the Honda, the 2nd row leg room of the Toyota, but the likes really stopped there for anything outside the T&C.
Options on the T&C are more plentiful for less money (rear entertainment, nav, heated seats...).
Of note, the T&C is the ONLY one to offer remote start.
The DVD in the Sienna looked like a shotty 3rd-party install, while both the Odyssey and Sienna dashboards felt very poorly and/or cheaply designed.
-Blu-Ray dual DVD's
-Heated steering wheel
-Touch-screen nav/infotainment unit with Garmin maps, back-up camera
-Stow-n-Go seating, can fit full 4'x8' board flat when all the seats are folded!
-General button layout
-Built-in rear window shades
-Dash LCD menu organization is odd, fairly easy to reset certain metrics with the button navigation.
-Auto -Up windows would be nice
-Brightwork in interior is well-designed and tastefull, that being said the driver's vent trim reflects into the window right through the mirror line-of-sight, distracting.
Many minor issues with radio/nav unit:
-Garmin nav needs live traffic overlay on maps.
-Split radio/nav screen would be nice instead of switching back and forth all the time.
-Front DVD passenger operation while moving.
We understand the safety aspect, but when you're trying to load a movie for the rear-seat passengers (fussy kids) and can't see the menu...
Great review and I agree.
Just got back from the DFW auto show and was able to view all three (I sat in a Nissan Quest 2014 for about 30 secs and knew it was not even close for consideration).
The Honda, good reputation, nice overall but other than its name I was not really thinking 45k for the limited was a good spend.
It lacked refinement and lacked any upgrades technically that I thought warranted 45k....but it does have a vacuum on board.
The Toyota, what can I say?
Apples to Apples, this one may have a great name but when comparing build quality to Chrysler and Honda, I though Toyota was a big let down.
It also lacks any noticeable upgrades worthy of the price, IMHO.
I feel that way for all Toyotas.....all they are really selling is reliability...
its kind of like marrying a person only because they have a great resume.
But in Toyotas case, they don't even back that up with a longer warranty.
If the cars are that reliable, then prove it by offering a longer warranty.
I predict Toyota will be the Sony of cars in 10 years.
Sony is a name your respect but you'd rather buy the LG or Panasonic because they are better buys.
The Chrysler has it all, IMHO.
NO, it does not win awards for reliability but its not a dog either.
Resale wise, if you compare a 2006 Chrysler to a 2006 Odyssey, the Odyssey wins by about 4 to 5 grand.
....but you pay that premium on the front end.
A Touring-L with sunroof and everything will run about 33 with discounts.
A Odyssey will be 40k at best for a limited.
Plus with Chrysler you can get a MOPAR lifetime warranty for around 2500.00.
So you still come out ahead with the Chrysler by 3-4 grand.
And remember money saved now is more money later.
The Chrysler is the better buy among mini-vans.
...unless you are looking to show that you value reputation above good value.
Levis jeans for 50.00 versus Member Mark jeans for 12.00.
Both wear well...but one has a name.
† Edmunds.com received the highest numerical score in the proprietary J.D. Power 2014 Third-Party Automotive Website Evaluation Study℠. Results based on responses from 3,381 responses, measuring 14 companies and measures third-party automotive website usefulness among new and used vehicle shoppers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of owners surveyed from January 2014. Your experiences may vary. Visit jdpower.com.