Used 1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV Consumer Reviews - 19 Car Reviews | Edmunds
ADVERTISEMENT

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV - Consumer Reviews

Average Consumer Rating

19 Total Reviews

View reviews for a specific S-10 Blazer model:

Sort by

Most Recent|
Most Recent Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
BLAZINBEAST
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By blazinhard
on

Vehicle

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV 2dr SUV


Review

bought this bub for 500 bones, shes got 226 k miles and she still gets it, best truck for the price, allways fires up, neva leaves me hangin yo, she da bomb, i <3 this truck.


Best Features

everything dawg


Worst Features

none


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

My Truck
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By Laurie Lea
on

Vehicle

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV Tahoe 4dr SUV 4WD


Review

I love my S10 Blazer. I bought it in 2002 with 76,000 miles and now has 250,000. Never fails to start even when -20+ degrees. It has plenty of power(4.3L TBI) and gets decent gas mileage 18mpg city 24mpg highway. It has typical Chevy rust as it is 18 yrs. old. The only thing I am not happy with is the electronic 4WD. vac.actuator switch went out and got fluid in vac.actuator. We manually pull cable to engage front Diff. and still use button on dash.What helps is to use 4X4 all year round (use when driving;gravel,yard,field)this helps system lubricate parts.


Best Features

I think everything abt. my truck is great


Worst Features

4X4 electronic shift system. The vac.Actuator switch can go bad and allow tranny fluid to bleed into vac. system. Also, the electronic control module can seize up and it is very expensive. with all the smart people they could have thought of a better set up.all S10 push button are the same.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Awesome!
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By sean2929
on

Vehicle

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV Tahoe 2dr SUV


Review

I purchased a 92 s10 Blazer Tahoe, for my sons 15th b-day and it had 226,223 miles on it. Ran great surprisingly until an episode with the woods with a broken motor mount and the transmission kept on popping into neutral and eventually blew it up. But we dropped another 4.3 in it and this time we added some major modifications performance wise. But definitely dependable and he absolutely loves it!


Best Features

how tough the the transmission is and the POWER it comes with. but this truck has incredible towing power.


Worst Features

the turn signal/ cruise/ wiper handle breaks often, and door handles go bad real fast.


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

nice
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By gregger
on

Vehicle

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV Tahoe 4dr SUV 4WD


Review

i don't own this vehicle anymore but it was the best vehicle i've ever owned it never got stuck i beat on it alot and it prolly would still be running good if i didn't mud bog with it so much but over all i miss this vehicle alot


Best Features

lightweight fourwheel drive it goes everywhere


Worst Features

starter wires are extremely hard to get at


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

Good when taken care of!
Performance
Comfort
Fuel Economy
Fun To Drive
Interior Design
Exterior Design
Build Quality
Reliability
By jrshaw85
on

Vehicle

1992 Chevrolet S-10 Blazer SUV Tahoe 2dr SUV


Review

I purchased this truck for $1000. It gave me very little trouble. (uv joints,some sensors) I recently had to pull the engine when it reached 229,814 miles. Yes that's the correct mileage. I went with a 1999-2000 model engine because they are factory with 240hp and that's great for when I pull my boat or my tools. This is a very well rounded truck/SUV. GM got this right so if you are looking for a good vehicle this is one of them!


Best Features

Engine, drivetrain (700-R4 trans cant beat it), exterior design, cold weather performance.


Worst Features

Interior design, ride quailty, ride height


Was this review helpful? Yes | No

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Other Vehicles to Consider

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT