2009 Cadillac CTS-V Road Test Ratings

As a pure performance sedan, it is true that the CTS-V is at the top of the heap right now. Cadillac clearly set a new benchmark with this car. That doesn't mean the CTS-V is the right car for a traditional Cadillac buyer, nor does it mean Cadillac will own this prized perch forever.

Obviously, big horsepower, but also big torque from the supercharged V8 combine to make going fast almost too effortless. Criticisms include unsupportive standard driver seat (upgrade to the Recaro) and slow-reacting manual shift buttons on the steering wheel of the automatic which only operate when in Manual gate (no override of Drive). A six-speed manual is also available. Steering features two selectable levels of effort/effectiveness and limit-handling can be disorienting because it's such a large car. All this adds up to a ridiculously fun car to drive. Nearly everybody underestimates the performance of this car -- which makes it fun(ner).

Despite the car's clearly focused dynamic priorities, it's actually a comfortable car, as well. Two-stage adaptive shock absorbers help in this regard. Wind and road noise are well isolated from the cabin. Rear-seat comfort is average, but the driving position can be awkward for long-legged drivers. Rear entry/exit also can be tricky through what are effectively "triangular" doors. Opt for the faux suede steering wheel and Recaro seating package -- both are worth it.

Functionally, the CTS-V is nearly identical to a standard CTS -- which is a good thing. Intuitive controls, excellent infotainment system. Unlike the CTS V6, the rear seats of the CTS-V do not fold forward to expand the cargo capacity.

Don't you think it looks like it's trying too hard, or is this the best interpretation of the CTS theme to date? Do you think it's a bit of a rolling contradiction as a "high-performance" Cadillac, or is that what you love about it? Has Cadillac been building the CTS-V long enough to know where the gremlins might be lurking, or are there any there at all?