-
Re: New A6 3.2l Acceleration Concerns [luckylindy]
Written by: markcincinnati on Feb 8, 2005 1:15:09 PM
Same as it ever was, same as it ever was: 1997 A8 5spd NON tip but "adaptive" auto 1999 A6 5spd tiptronic 2000 A6 4.2 5spd tiptronic 2001 A6 4.2sport 5sped tiptronic -- all had EXACTLY the tip lag or combination transmission+drive by wire lag symptoms. On the other hand none of the other two dozen Audis that we have had since our first one in 1977 that ... Read More
-
Does Audi want me?
Written by: cpeterson3 on Feb 3, 2005 7:36:28 AM
I must agree with a number of the recent comments made and would like to interject from a current buyers prospective. I am 3 months away from the termination of my ’02 A4 lease and was up until recently, looking forward to the ’05 A6 as my next car. As has been well documented, the launch of the A6 has been less than spectacular bordering on non-existent. I first saw the ... Read More
-
Re: Competition? [kirby2010]
Written by: jeqq on Jan 13, 2005 7:48:56 PM
Here in NYC and surrounding communities we've seen an explosion of Audi's over the years. When I first leased one in 1999 they were not as prevalent as they are now. I believe the euro/dollar exchange rate has something to do with their current marketing strategy in the USA. Maybe they think the dollar is going to reverse and increase in value against the euro. Better to sell more cars later ... Read More
-
Re: My thoughts.... [jgaines]
Written by: markcincinnati on Dec 30, 2004 1:01:58 PM
Tiptronic Lag. This condition, called tip-lag, has been discussed and discussed to death, here and elsewhere -- it has been a topic in the Quattro Quarterly, a publication of the Audi Car Club of NA. FWIW, this condition is not an Audi-only condition. Scant better that makes me feel. Hence I am now off the fence again and thinking I just cannot take another auto transmission (my 1997 A8, ... Read More
-
Re: Should I buy one? [triumphbobk]
Written by: markcincinnati on Jul 13, 2004 7:09:23 AM
Run away from this scenario. The 2.7T is a great performing engine -- the 2001 may have some parts issues that, although probably able to be CPO'd to 100K or 2 years, still makes a newer car less money. The brake rotors on the 2001's are notorius for warping. The 2.7T engine will need a serpentine belt replacement by 60K miles (this is a four figure job). Around 60K miles, maintenance ... Read More
-
Leased almost every one. . .(paid cash for one, a used 1987 5000 TQ. . .)
Written by: markcincinnati on Mar 24, 2004 11:28:22 AM
Of the cars since 1977 we have had, we leased the majority of them -- longest term, as I recall, 36 months, shortest 12 months (I leased a 1999 A6 for 12 months when I was coming upon 50,000 miles on my 1997 A8 while I was waiting for my 2000 A6 4.2 to arrive). My last Audi I leased for 30 months, the current one 36 months since I was ... Read More
-
Maybe they got the bugs out......
Written by: markj10 on Nov 30, 2003 9:35:39 AM
Nice to hear that some people have had much better luck than I have with the A6. Maybe they just didn't get the bugs out until latter models as I know many with 1998,1999 and 2000 models with similar reliability problems and some with even worse issues.... and Audi not willing to do anything about it.....anyway my household had been poisoned by this experience and my wife has made it clear ... Read More
-
More Winter TIres
Written by: max27t on Dec 11, 2002 10:13:03 AM
Mark, Tim, and Joel, thanks for your comments on the tires. I am comfortable with my decision to use winter tires, but open to second-guessing on whether the Q was the right selection. Nokians are not as well known as Blizzaks, but I have used and liked them for 10 years. This is the fourth set I've bought. Two of those went with the car when we sold it, and only ... Read More
-
Max
Written by: markcincinnati on Aug 19, 2002 1:02:36 PM
Northland is a very good dealership. And, I try to be a good customer. I inform the service manager of my issue, he checks it out -- he makes the determination of what needs to be done. I have written AoA to praise the dealer and its employees by name whenever appropriate (which is probably at least once or twice a year). I give the dealership a 5 (out of 5) ... Read More
-
1999 A6 Quattro
Written by: felixoz on May 19, 2002 9:40:49 AM
Picking up a fully kitted-out '99 A6 Quattro this Tuesday, after much research and some useful comments from you guys a couple of months ago. As expected, drove beautifully. Test drove it on a wet Houston day - pushed it around corners and stuck to road like glue. Takes some time to get up and go, but once going, really moves. Just like everyone says! It's got an interesting note when ... Read More
-
3.0 vs. 2.7t, for Max....
Written by: morphie on Apr 29, 2002 3:31:43 PM
This is an important comparison, which has had far too little discussion. We all seem to get wrapped up in the 4.2 and 2.7t; that is understandable, as they represent the current pinnacle of A6 performance. The 3.0, as compared to it predecessor, the 2.8, is a revelation: much better torque, top end power, etc. The seat of the pants feel is even more remarkable: this engine, if marketed against the ... Read More
-
2002 A6 3.0
Written by: morphie on Apr 29, 2002 8:02:01 AM
I think that Bradd's comments (especially his Mom's), are quite intriguing. We have a 2000 2.7t and a 2002 A6 3.0. The suspension of the 3.0 is noticeable firmer than the 1999 A6 2.8 which preceded it. However, I find it acceptable, especially on rough New England roads. While the steering may be over boosted to some, it is less so than the 1999, and comparable to our 2.7t. As for ... Read More
-
A friend of mine bought the BMW. . .and On*star
Written by: markcincinnati on Apr 7, 2002 1:48:11 PM
After what I thought was a completely objective (ha!) series of visits to European car dealers all involving test drives,my friend had pretty much decided on an Audi. A few weeks later when I next saw him he said come see my new car -- another Audi convert I thought to myself. Lo and behold a new metallic black BMW (330, I think -- RWD). The car is very nice -- ... Read More
-
Audi A6
Written by: felixoz on Apr 2, 2002 5:39:22 PM
New to this forum and about to move to TX from Australia! Looking at buying a 1999 A6 for interior size (I'm 6'5" tall), comfort and handling. Scrolling through everyones discussion, seems there are quite some reliability issues! This was surprising. Most of the reliability problem models seem to be flagged in Edmunds.com reviews (eg. some of the Jeep Cherokee models!) What is the consensus with '99 and '00 A6 models? ... Read More
-
In my garage. . .
Written by: markcincinnati on Feb 11, 2002 6:32:10 PM
For the next day or possibly two there is a loaner 2002 Audi A6 3.0 -- my wife's TT is in the shop for what appears to be a dead power window motor (and the part, if needed will probably be a day or two in arriving). The new 3.0 is a quattro and has several options, including leather, home link, compass, tiptronic, upgraded stereo and heated seats, etc. The car ... Read More
-
CD-R Problems
Written by: minos2 on Feb 10, 2002 11:22:05 AM
I am having difficulty playing music CD-R discs in my 2001 Audi A6 4.2 sedan. I recently installed a TDK 24x10x40x CD Burner in my computer. I have been able to play high speed music CD-R discs in my $80.00 portable CD player, my compact stereo CD player, and my wife's 1999 Volvo S80 sedan without any problems. I have used different CD-R brands and have decreased my burn speed from ... Read More
-
Not horror, but close....
Written by: morphie on Jan 31, 2002 6:17:23 PM
Our last several A6's have been 1999's and, now, a 2002. While the cars have been quite pleasurable, each has suffered from some problems, primarily electrical. The most recent acquisition, a 2002 A6, has 5,500 miles. It was in for a minor body repair; out of an excess of caution, I asked for the car to be put through the electronic diagnostic. It indicated a problem with the exhaust camshaft. When ... Read More
-
Nit pick, etc.
Written by: markcincinnati on Jan 29, 2002 1:19:35 PM
The 4.2 is faster, the 2.7T is quicker -- yet, in the US, they are equally fast as they are top speed limited to 130mph. The differences between the cars is principally one of "feel" -- to me the 4.2 feels even more solid than the 2.7T (this is due, in part, to the fact that the car despite extensive use of aluminum IS HEAVIER), consequently it is very very smooth ... Read More
-
A6 v 540i
Written by: peteri1 on Dec 5, 2001 7:13:59 AM
In Illinois (11/21) I received lease quotes for both the A6 4.2 and the 540i. Audi is calling it at 54% residual at 39 months and BMW at 60% at 36 months. I believe BMW may be subsidizing since the model is in its last year of the cycle. The CNN comments apply to the 98 A6 which was the 2.8 derivative, prior to the release of the 2.7T and the ... Read More
-
A4, A6 and tiptronic
Written by: morphie on Oct 18, 2001 5:10:07 PM
I also have a few observations on your impending choice. First, both Mark and Tim have rendered good advice. I have no ownership experience with the 4.2. My familiarity is limited to the A6 2.8 and the 2.7T. The 1999 A6 was an Avant; it has been replaced with a 2002 A6 3.0. The difference is striking. While I expected the increase in horsepower and torque to be noticeable, in reality ... Read More
-
4.2 congratulations and winter tires....
Written by: morphie on Oct 2, 2001 1:27:09 PM
The A6 4.2 sounds like an ideal choice; I wish you many years (if ownership) or months (if lease) of enjoyment. Quattro compensates, up to a point, for winter conditions; it apportions what traction you have in a far more sophisticated manner than non all wheel drive. Traction, in the engineering sense, comes from the tires interaction with the road surface. In other words, if you are as fond of your ... Read More
-
Audi/VW Platforms
Written by: timcar on Aug 28, 2001 10:55:59 AM
Jared, here's a complete list of Audi platforms from Audi AG. The W8 does ride on a DIFFERENT larger platform than other Passats, the same one used for the A6. I'd forgotten about this until I got a recent issue of Auto Week, noticed the car looked bigger and longer. I discounted it until I looked up this table again, and apparently, it is bigger and longer. The same photo's are ... Read More
-
Brakes
Written by: markcincinnati on Aug 23, 2001 7:24:12 AM
Virtually all of my Audis have had brake squeaks. The 1999, 2000 and 2001 have been the only exceptions (A6 2.8, A6 4.2, A6 4.2 in that order). Regarding the pedal issue only my 4.2's have had spongy pedal feel -- since I do not know if your A6 is a 2.8 or 2.7T/4.2, I don't know if my experience is meaningful. Whenever I have been loaned an A6 2.8 quattro ... Read More
-
Set the record straight
Written by: markcincinnati on Aug 10, 2001 12:04:33 PM
I have owned three A6 class automobiles with the 2.8 powerplant (1992 100S 1993 100S 1999 A6 2.8)-- and, at the moment in time that I owned them, I thought they were the best cars I ever had. All of them, except the '99 were 5spd manuals and they performed very well in every aspect. Even the '99 A6 2.8 was very enjoyable, comfortable and fast -- it just wasn't quick ... Read More
-
Do not be discouraged, etc.
Written by: markcincinnati on Jul 29, 2001 1:32:15 PM
If you have just joined in on the Edmunds town - hall A6 message board, and have read the "lively" converstations pertaining to my A6 4.2 brakes (and some 2.7T's and now A8's brakes), and remarks from timcar, bertram60, etc. I want to tell you that none of the problems I have had would put me off buying another Audi or another future A6. I suspect that even those, like me, ... Read More
-
Lease or Buy??????
Written by: rodneybarrett on Jul 16, 2001 6:27:24 PM
I need some advice. I have a chance to either buy a 1998 Audi A6 (not quattro), it has 27K miles on it and is certified to 75K / 5 years. price $24K. It is in great condition. or ... I could do the new lease thing and get a 2001 Audi A6 quattro for about $10 a month more than my payment would be on the abvoce car. My problem ... Read More
-
1998 A6 2.8
Written by: lostwages on Jul 16, 2001 11:33:07 AM
I would like to hear opinions regarding the 1998 A6. I test drove 2 over the weekend (one w/ 27,000 miles and one w/ 37,000 - both Audi Certified). Both were priced at $28,000. I have not owned an Audi before. The 37,000 mile car had "every option" as far as I could tell. The 27,000 mile car did not have the Bose stereo or CD changer. As I don't live ... Read More
-
Tire size and other things jk
Written by: markcincinnati on Jul 12, 2001 6:34:19 AM
JK Ralph, at Northland Audi in Cincinnati, told me the 2002 A6 2.7T has a great deal of the look of a 2001 A6 4.2 -- flared front fenders, below the grill spoiler/air intake, etc. Now this tells me that it would be possible for the tire size to be 255 x 40 x 17. But, based on past experience with Audi's, they will probably have a somewhat smaller tire -- ... Read More
-
no title
Written by: markcincinnati on Jun 18, 2001 11:08:32 AM
I must admit my 2000 A6 was leased through a bank -- term 27 months. I bailed out of the car @ 17 months and 23,000 miles. I got Audi of America to make the first payment on the 2001 A6 (on an AFS 30 month lease, no money down and no sec dep). I walked out of the dealer with the new car with 29 payments to go.) I still ... Read More
-
Brakes
Written by: markcincinnati on Jun 11, 2001 3:08:20 PM
The Audi A6 models 2.7T and 4.2 use different brakes than the 2.8. I had a 1999 A6 2.8 quattro, kept it about 15,000 miles and never any problems with the brakes. I then leased a 2000 A6 4.2 -- new rotors were required at 1,000 miles -- they chattered and purred and vibrated from mile 1. New front rotors again about 12,000 miles later -- for a total of three ... Read More
-
To MarkCincinnati
Written by: jcthom4 on Jun 5, 2001 12:13:05 PM
Hi Mark, I live in the West Chaster/airfield area and am interested in a 1999/2000 A6 quattro or 2.7T. Since you probably know other Audi owners that take immaculate care of their cars... do you know of anyone wanting to sell in the next 6 months? I have visited North land and agree they are great, however their preowned selection is always limited. Thank you in advance ! Jeff T.
-
option configurations changed between model years?
Written by: traderalex1 on May 19, 2001 8:02:52 PM
So what did Audi do with their option packages, from 1999 to 2000? I have a 2000 A6 Avant. No auto dimming mirrors included with the sunroof package, as compared to the '99 model year. Personally, I don't care about memory seats, or an ability to change station channels on the steering wheel. But the lack of the auto dimming mirrors is annoying. It seems absurd to have a car in ... Read More
-
A8 or A6
Written by: idkillarmy on May 16, 2001 8:22:42 PM
I am looking to purchase my first Audi in the upcoming month but I am having trouble on deciding which to get, A 1998 A8 with 50-60K miles or an 1999 A6 with 30-40k miles. The A8 is bigger more luxiourus, etc, etc but the A6 is newer and has less miles. Would anyone that has had one or both of these give me hand on which to get?
