|
(Enlarge photo)
The previous Forester was a bit homely in front. The overall look in front is smoother and more cohesive now.
(Photo by Scott Jacobs)
|
|
|
|
(Enlarge photo)
Is this a Subaru interior? Yep. There are two interior colors available: gray and beige. We prefer the beige. XS models have superior materials compared to the base Forester.
(Photo by Scott Jacobs)
|
|
|
|
(Enlarge photo)
The two-tone exterior is standard, though XS models have a more metallic look to their body cladding. If you order the premium package, Subaru takes off the body cladding and paints the Forester in just one color.
(Photo by Scott Jacobs)
|
|
|
See All Photos
|
|
|
|
Road Test: Full Test
|
|
Full Test: 2003 Subaru Forester
Tommi Makinen's Urban Runabout
By
Brent Romans, Senior Automotive Editor
Date posted: 08-08-2002
I've never done well in those contests that ask you to guess how many items are
in a particular container. Such as, "How many gumballs are in this giant globe?"
Or "How many politicians in Congress are scummy?" I dunno, a lot?
So how many mini-SUVs are being sold today? Ah-hah. Easy. Thanks to the Edmunds.com
Web site, I can say with fair confidence that there are 13 different vehicles
for 2003. Now all you have to do is pick one.
Easier said than done. Within this group of 13, there are two distinct subgroups.
The first is the truck-based SUVs, with examples being the Nissan Xterra and Jeep
Liberty. They are tough off-road but not as comfortable on city streets. The other,
and more popular, group consists of the car-based crossover-style SUVs like the
Honda CR-V, Saturn Vue and Toyota RAV4. Since 1998, the Subaru Forester has been
a part of this second category.
Though not hugely popular, the Forester has been a success for Subaru. Our road
test in 1998 wasn't all that favorable, commenting that, "The Forester is less
attractive, less spacious, feels slower and rolls more in corners than the Legacy
Outback. It also isn't nearly as much fun to drive as the Impreza Outback Sport."
We concluded, however, Subaru did not design the Forester to cannibalize Impreza
and Legacy Outback sales. Rather, "[the Forester was] designed to supplement them;
to give SUV buyers the blocky box and big chrome grille they want, coupled with
car-like handling, performance and user-friendliness. If you can get past certain
styling elements, Subaru has accomplished the job."
The all-new 2003 Forester is significantly updated. As we reported in our first
drive, the Forester has made strides in value, comfort, refinement and driving
dynamics. Many of its mechanical components are similar to those of the Impreza
Outback Sport, though it does offer more hardened styling, additional interior
room, more ground clearance and more features.
We obtained two 2003 Subaru Foresters for evaluation. The first was a blue 2.5
XS with an automatic transmission, while the second was a red 2.5 XS with the
Premium package and a manual transmission. Over the course of two weeks, we subjected
the pair to city driving, long-distance highway travel, runs to home-improvement
stores and light-duty off-roading.
Previous Subarus had a reputation for rather chintzy interiors, but the new Forester
is a welcome departure. With the beige-colored interior, in particular, the Forester
reminds us of highly regarded VW products like the Golf and Jetta. The instrument
panel is symmetrical and modern looking, and the gauge cluster — straight
out of the Impreza — features large and easy-to-read white-on-black gauges.
Automatic transmission-equipped vehicles feature a helpful in-dash gear indicator.
Another welcome improvement is the location of the clock, which is now mounted
near the top of the dash.
The Forester's interior materials are better than average for this class, with
an ample supply of soft-touch surfaces and attractive silver metallic trim for
the center stack. Foresters in XS trim are more upscale than those in X trim,
as they include upgraded upholstery and carpeting and a leather-wrapped steering
wheel and shift knob. Should you want leather, it's available via the optional
Premium package (on automatic transmission-equipped vehicles only, however).
The climate system is now controlled through three dials. Their operation is unusual
in that the dials click in single steps rather than rotating completely. XS models
have an automatic mode, as well. We found the three-dial design to work quite
well. One editor noted, however, that the climate system, when placed in automatic
mode, blew out air for excessively long periods of time even when it was obvious
that the cabin had reached the desired temperature.
In terms of features, the Forester comes standard with items like 16-inch tires
and wheels; a remote-release fuel door; three power points; a full-size spare
tire; power windows, mirrors and locks; and keyless entry. In XS trim, the Forester
also comes with alloy wheels, an in-dash six-disc CD changer, the aforementioned
auto climate system and rear disc brakes with EBD. For safety, there are front
seatbelt pre-tensioners and load limiters, three-point seatbelts for all passengers,
antilock brakes, head- and chest-protecting side airbags for front passengers
and front whiplash-reducing head restraints. If you want additional items, there's
a host of them available, ranging from a cold-weather package to a kayak carrier.
Watch the bottom line, though; our automatic-equipped Forester came in at more
than $24,000, and that's lightly equipped.
We expect vehicles of this type to offer interior storage and cargo abilities
above and beyond the average sedan or four-door hatchback. In this regard, the
Forester only partially succeeds. The front door pockets and slots on the sunvisors
are useful, but the center console's bin is small and there's no console-mounted
cubby for loose and frequently accessed items like a cell phone. Perhaps Subaru
thought the lidded and lined compartment on the top of the dash would suffice,
but it's too inconvenient in that regard.
The rear cargo area fairs better. The rear liftgate is easy to raise, and it reveals
32 cubic feet of volume with the rear seats up. For reference, the Toyota RAV4
offers 29.2 cubic feet and the Honda CR-V holds 33.5. All Foresters get a cargo
shade, a power point, two rear storage bins and three extra storage areas underneath
the floor. The floor's lift-over height is low, and there are also two cargo tie-downs
and two grocery-bag hooks. Owners should find these features useful for outdoor
adventures, as well as more mundane shopping trips.
To carry larger items, the Forester's rear seats easily fold flat (the rear headrests
don't have to be removed) to increase maximum capacity to 64.1 cubic feet. This
is shy of most other vehicles in this class (the CR-V offers 72 cubic feet, for
instance), but the shortage shouldn't be an issue for most uses. An adjustable
roof rack is standard.
Most of us found the front seats to be comfortable. The driver seat is manually
operated and it offers adjustable lumbar support. There's no standard center armrest
for the driver, however. On the plus side, outward visibility is excellent. The
liftgate's glass area is large, and the rear seat's center position has a small
headrest and a shoulder belt that folds up into the headliner when not in use.
Rear passengers are obviously second-class citizens in the Forester. Rear legroom
(33.7 inches) is adequate, but plenty of other vehicles in this class offer more.
Our editors found that, while there was plenty of toe room, thigh support was
lacking. Children should be fine in the backseat, but adults will likely find
it to be uncomfortable over long durations of time. A rear-seat child seat anchor
system is new; the anchor points are mounted on the headliner to reduce the chance
of having the tethers interfering with loaded cargo (though this setup could hamper
rear visibility). One other nice touch is the very large sunroof that is available
as part of the optional premium package. Note, however, that it does reduce the
rear headroom by almost 3 inches.
Once moving, the Forester offers up a pleasant and satisfying driving experience.
Wind and road noise are average for the class. The only engine offered is a carry-over
from the previous model, a 2.5-liter flat four. It's also now the entry-level
engine for Subaru's entire lineup. It makes 165 horsepower at 5,600 rpm and 166
lb-ft of torque at 4,000 rpm. It lacks some of the more advanced engine technologies
that are becoming popular (such as variable valve timing), but its power output
is equal to or better than other four-cylinder engines offered in this class.
The EPA rates the automatic-equipped Forester at 21 city/26 highway. We averaged
22 mpg in combined (and fairly aggressive) driving.
If you really want power, though, V6-equipped SUVs like the Ford Escape (and its
twin, the Mazda Tribute) or Saturn Vue offer more. Tow capacity when fitted with
a Class I hitch is 2,400 pounds on manual-equipped Foresters or 2,000 pounds for
those with automatics. Subaru offers an Impreza WRX engine (about 225 hp) in European-bound
Foresters, but no word as to whether it will be offered here in the future.
To its advantage, the Forester weighs less than most of its competition. During
our performance testing, the automatic-equipped Forester went from 0 to 60 mph
in 9.9 seconds. The manual car was a bit faster at 9.4 seconds. The 200-hp V6-equipped
Ford Escape is generally considered the jackrabbit of this class, and the last
time we tested it, it did the 0-to-60-mph sprint in 9.3 seconds. We've also test
a manual-equipped Honda CR-V; it did 0-to-60 in 8.7 seconds.
Other than the acceleration times, we noticed little difference between the two
Foresters. As with all Subaru products, all-wheel drive is standard equipment.
There is a slight difference as to the type of AWD system depending on what type
of transmission the vehicle comes with. A mechanical all-wheel-drive system is
offered on manual-equipped cars, and a more advanced electronically controlled
system comes with the automatic transmission. During normal driving, we couldn't
detect a difference between the two.
The automatic will likely be the choice for most buyers, though the return of
the Hill Holder feature makes the choice of the manual a bit easier for those
living in San Francisco. This useful system automatically holds the brakes down
should the driver have to stop while climbing a hill. If the driver takes her
foot off the brake pedal, the Forester will stay pat. This allows her to work
the clutch and throttle without having to worry about rolling backwards. The brakes
release automatically when forward motion is achieved. In general, it works well.
But in some situations, we found the Hill Holder to be an annoyance. In particular,
there were times we wanted to roll backwards, such as when parallel parking
on a slight grade, or when needing to roll back down a steep hill when off-roading.
Why would you want to roll backwards when off-roading? How about when the Forester
is stuck and forward progress is no longer possible? This happened to us when
taking the manual-equipped Forester into the dirt. Make no mistake; this isn't
a Jeep Wrangler, or even a Nissan Xterra. Compared to other car-based SUVs, though,
the Forester's in-the-dirt capabilities are pretty similar. Ground clearance is
7.5 inches. The suspension's tuning isn't particularly soft, and consequently,
the Forester's ride quality can be jarring when driving on harsh trails. But if
you just need access to trailheads or camping spots, the Forester will do just
fine.
On city streets, the Forester shines. Subaru notes that suspension design (MacPherson
struts at all four corners) is similar to the previous Forester's but has been
considerably improved to reduce body roll and refine the ride quality. The '03
Forester feels balanced, composed and never top-heavy. Driving quickly around
corners is actually enjoyable because of excellent grip and a decent amount of
road feel; one can tell the Forester has taken cues from the new Impreza platform.
The steering is light and accurate with progressive weighting — this is certainly
one of the most fun-to-drive mini-utes on the market.
But is that enough to solidify a Forester purchase? If all you want is a fun-to-drive
car with some cargo room, an Impreza TS Sport Wagon would be a better choice.
Similarly, a Legacy Wagon GT has more versatility, though it's not as capable
off-road. So what we're left with is a conclusion that sounds similar to the one
in our '98 road test. The Forester is an attractive package that does a decent
job of everything. It's better than most mini-utes and certainly worth taking
for a test drive. But if you want a vehicle that specializes in a particular field
— whether it's performance, cargo room or off-road ability — you'll
want to consider a few others before the Forester.
|
|
|
